The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ArticlesNo Access

Specifics and Nonspecifics in Psychotherapy

The specifics/nonspecifics issue in psychotherapy has given rise consecutively to three major positions: (a) The systems’ position, in which each specific approach to therapy views itself alone as embodying true theory and rightful practice, while rivaling approaches are seen as superficial or unscientific, (b) The nonspecifics’ position in which the latter are seen as sole carriers of therapeutic effects, (c) The recent integrative position in which instead of the systems’ self-immured isolation or the nonspecifics’ paralyzing equivalence of all therapies, a synthesis of specific approaches within a larger nonspecific theory or practical strategy is attempted.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.