Object Relations and Intersubjectivity in Depression

Starting with a clinical vignette the authors discuss Freud’s thesis from “Mourning and Melancholia” (1917) that depression is a defense against the experience of loss: Whilst a part of the self remains identified with the lost object another part directs all the aggression against it that originally had been directed against the object. As a result the relationship between self and object becomes replaced by a pathological relationship between parts of the self. As psychoanalytical and phenomenological-hermeneutical approaches congruently show, one reason why mourning cannot proceed and feelings of guilt cannot be worked through lies in the fact that depressive patients need a symbiotic, idealizing type of identification with their objects in order to stabilize their identity. Because of their narcissistic vulnerability changes, personal failures, and disappointment by their objects, which may provoke unconscious aggression and fear of loss, can easily threaten their psychic equilibrium. This gives rise to considerable difficulties within the transference-countertransference relationship. The authors argue that to establish a feeling of autonomy in depressive patients, a secure framework within therapy has to be offered and at the same time the negative transference must thoroughly be worked through.